Why We Can’t Base Our Training on the Fitness Industry or Extreme Sports – An Individualized Perspective on Strength Training
Why We Can’t Base Our Training on the Fitness Industry or Extreme Sports – An Individualized Perspective on Strength Training
In the fitness world, the fitness industry and extreme sports have long served as ideals and benchmarks for what a “well-trained body” should look like or be able to do. These ideals, often presented through visually striking images on social media or competitive formats that demand extreme discipline, strict diets, and often unhealthy lifestyles, shape many people’s perceptions of training. The problem is that these representations rarely have anything to do with health or sustainable training. Research shows that targeted, regular strength training has far more fundamental and important effects than these extreme images convey, especially as we age.
Strength training is one of the most well-documented forms of exercise for counteracting age-related muscle loss (sarcopenia) and maintaining functional capacity. Regular strength training increases muscle mass and strength even in older adults, which in turn can reduce the risk of falls, improve metabolic health, and enhance quality of life (Peterson et al., 2010; Liu & Latham, 2009). At the same time, increased muscle mass often changes the body’s appearance – something that does not always align with a slim or aesthetic ideal. Studies show that strength training leads to hypertrophy, i.e., muscle growth, which often means larger thighs, a broader waist, and more muscular arms (Wernbom et al., 2007). This is a natural and healthy response to training – not a failure to “look like Instagram.”
It is therefore crucial that training is designed around the individual’s goals, circumstances, and life situation. Genetic variations play a significant role in how much muscle an individual can build and how quickly results appear. Muscle fiber type, hormonal profile, and body composition all affect training responses (Hubal et al., 2005). Comparing your own progress to someone else’s, especially an elite athlete or fitness model, is not only unrealistic – it can be directly harmful to motivation and self-esteem.
As a coach, it is essential to work based on the individual’s specific conditions. This means creating realistic goals, providing support through long-term training strategies, and educating about what constitutes health-promoting training. For some, this may involve building strength without major visual changes; for others, it may be about improving function, reducing pain, or increasing energy in daily life. Regardless of the goal, strength training is a powerful tool, but it must be used wisely – not copied from the fitness world’s external façade.
In an era where appearance often overshadows function and health, we need to remind ourselves that the value of training lies not in others’ eyes, but in how we feel, perform, and live. Sustainable training is individual, not idealized.
References
Hubal, M. J., et al. (2005). Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 37(6), 964–972.
Liu, C. J., & Latham, N. K. (2009). Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3.
Peterson, M. D., et al. (2010). Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 9(3), 226–237.
Wernbom, M., Augustsson, J., & Thomeé, R. (2007). The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Sports Medicine, 37(3), 225–264.
Comments
Post a Comment